A viral TikTok video has reignited public admiration for Judge David Fleischer of Harris County, Texas, known for his rigorous scrutiny of cases involving Black defendants. The latest clip shows Fleischer dismissing charges against a motorist accused of interference with the duties of a public servant after a traffic stop, questioning the sufficiency of the evidence presented by prosecutors. The video, shared widely this week, has been viewed nearly 11 million times.

The case involved a Black driver stopped for alleged speeding and unsafe lane changes. The prosecutor’s affidavit claimed the man exited his vehicle during the stop, prompting an officer to demand he return inside. When the motorist hesitated and asked, “Do I have to?” the officer reportedly attempted to detain him, citing resistance when the man “tensed up and locked his arms.” Fleischer, however, found the reasoning inadequate, repeatedly asking, “What’s he doing wrong?” as the prosecution struggled to substantiate the charges.

Fleischer’s decision turned on a lack of probable cause, which he emphasized throughout the hearing. Addressing the prosecution’s argument that exiting the car constituted interference, Fleischer appeared incredulous. “Really? Just getting out of the car? No,” he declared before dismissing the case. His pointed questions and insistence on the evidence underscored his reputation as a judge who does not tolerate weak charges, particularly those that appear to target Black defendants unfairly.

Viewers on TikTok lauded the judge’s handling of the case, with many praising his restraint in advising the defendant not to speak, potentially avoiding self-incrimination. Others highlighted Fleischer’s closing remarks to the defendant, which balanced stern advice—“Be careful out there”—with empathy: “Life is hard as it is. People are always out to get you. Be nice, and things will go well for you.”

This latest viral moment has renewed calls for greater accountability within the justice system and reminded viewers of the importance of judicial elections. Comments on the video reflected a broader sentiment that Fleischer’s approach exemplifies what fairness in the courtroom should look like, with one viewer noting, “This is why local elections to vote for judges is so important.”